Subject: Re: [boost] Stability: More on 3 level Boost libraries
From: Joel Falcou (joel.falcou_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-26 03:02:24
David Bergman wrote:
> Thinking about it a bit more, I would probably prefer a core set, called 'core' for lack of imagination, with a 'general' outshoot, directed at problem solving in any domain, and two other ones, 'sci' and 'other', directed towards specific domains. Yes, 'other' would not be huge...
>
Another important layer in my eyes (now I'm putting on my user cap), is
that the boost libraries are clearly meant to be either user-land
library (asio, regex, etc) and some are more developer-land library (all
the TMP one for example).
I think this should also appear in the potential subdivisions.