Subject: Re: [boost] Should Boost adopt pimpl/d-pointer as much as it can?
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-21 18:54:19
On 21 March 2010 18:37, Emil Dotchevski <emildotchevski_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> This line of thought misses the point of physically decoupling
> implementation details from interfaces. It *is* easier not to do it,
> this doesn't prove that it's better not to do it.
>
But worse is better.
"Just copy the headers" makes replication of the "virus" much easier.