Subject: Re: [boost] Boost, Decoupled and Accelerated
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-18 11:53:46
At Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:46:03 -0700,
Steven Watanabe wrote:
>
> AMDG
>
> David Abrahams wrote:
> >> A question from a user and occasional contributor to the overflowing bug
> >> tracker, hoping that you can provide an answer without compromising the
> >> dramatics for BoostCon :-)
> >>
> >> How could decentralization influence the overflowing bug tracker?
> >>
> >
> > A very good question. The most obvious thing is that projects could
> > all choose their own issue tracking systems, so nobody needs to be
> > bogged down by the slowness of a single Trac instance or tied to the
> > current stagnation of the Trac development effort.
> >
>
> I currently monitor all incoming tickets for all libraries.
> I won't appreciate having 50 places to look instead of 1.
Understood. Not everyone will be as interested as you are in all of
Boost, though.
But if there's a need for something like this, we can make it a
requirement for Boost libraries that they have a publicly-subscribable
mailing list hooked up to their issue tracker, and we can even make it
a service of Boost to aggregate those lists into one boost-issues list
to which you can subscribe.
Or we could decide that Boost policy keeps all project's trackers in
one place. Options are wide open.
-- Dave Abrahams Meet me at BoostCon: http://www.boostcon.com BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com