Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review closing down
From: vicente.botet (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-17 17:33:42
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrey Semashev" <andrey.semashev_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review closing down
>
> On 03/17/2010 05:52 PM, Steven Watanabe wrote:
>> AMDG
>>
>> vicente.botet wrote:
>>> * Severity: I would like that any sink filters thie severity the
>>> log_record is not added at all. Could this optimization be taken in
>>> account. For example if severity must be GT error to be logged, the
>>> following will not evaluate the ineficient_function().
>>> BOOST_LOG_SEV(slg, normal) << ineficient_function();
>>
>> I'm pretty sure that if no sink is going to accept the
>> record, then inefficient_function will indeed not
>> be called.
>
> I confirm.
Yes I see, but the log record will be build with all its attributes which will take more time than just checking for severity.
Vicente