Subject: Re: [boost] [multi_index] hashed_index erase(iterator) performance issue
From: Brad Higgins (bhiggins_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-17 09:39:06
On Mar 16, 2010, at 5:56 PM, OvermindDL1 wrote:
>
> We all know about the performance hit, however that style is mandated
> by the standard (which thankfully is still in flux, hopefully they
> will remove the need for it to return the iterator).
I researched it further yesterday, and found the thread about the
identical issue with unordered_map (I need to read my boost mail more
often!). I'm going to implement a void-return style version of erase,
like the workaround in unordered_map, and use that until this issue is
resolved officially.
Thanks,
Brad