Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Boost.Log formal review
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-03-13 10:39:07
On 03/12/2010 01:52 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>
> I believe that discussions about header-onlyness and relative merits thereof
> happened on this list before, and probably more than once, and it's safe
> to assume that no conclusion can ever be reached. Which probably means
> that the decision is with the author(s) of each individual library.
Agreed.