Subject: Re: [boost] [Filesystem V3] file_status over-design?
From: Scott McMurray (me22.ca+boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-26 22:11:16
On 23 February 2010 08:26, Beman Dawes <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> It was designed that way on the assumption that file_status would
> eventually include additional state information.
>
Would it be plausible for vendor-specific extensions here? It seemed
like the biggest obstactle to providing more was portability, not
implementation complexity.