Subject: Re: [boost] is review system in place is extremely slow? (was Re: [rfc] rcpp)
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-24 14:19:24
On 02/24/2010 02:15 PM, Vladimir Prus wrote:
>
> It's perfectly OK to move those 3 libraries to the 'detail' namespace of Boost.Task and
> have review as it is, as opposed to waiting. What do you think?
Please, don't go that way. At least Boost.Atomic is a widely demanded
addition to Boost, and if it goes as some closed implementation detail
for an other library, it would be a great shame for users (it would
surely be for me).
As an alternative I would suggest to settle a common review for the
three components, while leaving them all top level libraries. That would
resolve the issue of "partial approval" that Robert pointed out.