Subject: Re: [boost] Proposal for new variants of the Boost logo.
From: Jeffrey Bosboom (jbosboom_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-02-08 22:27:28
Jeffrey Bosboom wrote:
> Paul A. Bristow wrote:
>> PS Some were also in favour of a "Proposed for Boost" logo to be used
>> only *for
>> libraries in the review queue*,
>> but not yet in a final release. Others felt this was unnecessary. So
>> unless
>> there is strong support for this, it does not form part of this
proposal.
>
> Not only is it necessary, it makes it easy for users of the logo to do
> the right thing, by not removing the logo when they leave the review
> queue. Also, with the recent pace of the review queue being as it is,
> this risks becoming a semi-permanent status, and I'd prefer not to
> advertise that.
s/necessary/unnecessary/
s/right/wrong/
Sorry for having to send a second correction e-mail; I will proofread
more carefully next time. After all, the list isn't going anywhere
while I type and read.
--Jeffrey Bosboom