Subject: Re: [boost] [contract] Contract Programming Library
From: OvermindDL1 (overminddl1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2010-01-05 19:54:23
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 11:28 AM, vicente.botet <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lorenzo Caminiti" <lorcaminiti_at_[hidden]>
> To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 6:54 AM
> Subject: [boost] [contract] Contract Programming Library
>
>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am thinking to submit a library for Contract Programming (a.k.a.
>> Design By Contract (TM) ) for C++.
>>
>> I have drafted some of the library documentation in Boost-like format:
>> http://dbcpp.sourceforge.net/boost/libs/contract/doc/html/
>>
>> Comments?
>
> Hi,
>
> I find your library very interesting and except some unavoidable preprocessor ugly (), the syntax follows quite closely the C++ proposal.
>
> Have you considered to add block invariants? Maybe you can complete the table Contract Programming Feature Comparison.
>
> If I have understood your library require the type is CopyConstructible to manage with postconditions. Have you considered to relax this constraint?
>
> I have taken the freedonm to add it to the Boost Libraries Under Construction
> https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/LibrariesUnderConstruction . Let me know if all the informations are right.
For note, the Wt (C++ web toolkit) is making a Dbo sublibrary. No
fancy meta-programming techniques, but it runs well and is quite
lightweight. It has just been started, but it is already usable.