Subject: Re: [boost] [msm] eUML guard/action location
From: Adam Merz (adammerz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-09 08:22:45
Stewart, Robert writes:
>
> Here's another suggestion, though it breaks from the logical UML ordering
> Michael posted previously:
>
> DestState() = CurrentState() + cool_event()[guard()]/(action())
>
Here's another +1 for this. Not having a strong background with UML, but
preferring eUML to the standard frontend, I find this arrangement much more
logical.