Subject: Re: [boost] review request: addition to type_traits library of is_less_comparable<T, U> and others
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-12-07 12:47:15
On Dec 6, 2009, at 5:17 AM, Frédéric Bron wrote:
> The first proposed name
> for type traits checking only for existence and the second name for
> type traits checking for existence and standard behaviour, i.e. the
> operator returns non void convertible to something the user can supply
> as template parameter (default bool for comparison operators).
Nit: structural/syntactic elements like the function's return type should not be confused with behavioral/semantic ones.
-- David Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://boostpro.com