Subject: Re: [boost] GGL Review
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-16 11:01:52
AMDG
Barend Gehrels wrote:
> Iff we are accepted, we want to move to BoostBooks. If not, we will
> (probably) select something else, e.g. a Wiki. Because the library is
> large, we could not do this before review and take the risk to move
> after rejection to something else. We know that Doxygen is not
> perfect. What IS perfect in Doxygen is the integration between small
> code samples and documentation. All the samples you see do really
> compile. They are extracted automatically from sample-sources
> (included in the distribution). We want to keep this feature so on
> selecting another doc system we have to inventorize the possibilities
> (tips welcome).
Quickbook has a way to extract fragments from source code
http://tinyurl.com/ygjn8oh
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe