Subject: Re: [boost] New boost packaging suggestion for windows
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-11-06 00:01:58
On Thu, Nov 5, 2009 at 3:36 PM, troy d. straszheim <troy_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Feeling shamed into redoing it, I wrote a script that assumes that if file
> boost/X/F.hpp includes file boost/Y/f.hpp, then project X depends on Y. For
> toplevel files, if a file boost/K.hpp exists as well as a directory boost/K,
> then an include of boost/K.hpp is a dependency on K. for files boost/R.hpp
> where no subdirectory R exists, the dependency is either determined via an
> incomplete hand-constructed list of mappings from file to project, or the
> dependency is on special project UNCATEGORIZED. If a file is found that
> includes a file that does not exist, the dependency is on project MISSING.
>
That's pretty useful.
I'd like
X -> R.hpp
instead of
X -> UNCATEGORIZED
same with MISSING.
ie no loss of information in that case. At least for the text version.
Tony