Subject: Re: [boost] loglite - A logging library
From: OvermindDL1 (overminddl1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-28 21:04:53
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 1:17 PM, JD <jean.daniel.michaud_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 28, 5:51Â pm, Ruediger Berlich <ruediger.berl..._at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
>> JD wrote:
>> > Â Please have a look and let me know what you think could be improved.
>>
>> the SF page currently lists loglite as being covered by the LGPL, while some
>> source files I looked at are under the Boost license. Is all of loglite
>> under the Boost license ?
>>
>
> I haven't spend much time thinking about this but the story is, I
> wrote the library initially for boost and chose the boost license.
> When I checked in the code on googecode, the boost license was not
> available in the list.
> I wonder which one is more permissive.
The Boost license by far.
LGPL is still not usable by most corporate entities.