Subject: Re: [boost] Name of namespace detail
From: Stefan Strasser (strasser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-10-19 20:41:30
Am Tuesday 13 October 2009 01:57:16 schrieb Mateusz Loskot:
> Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
> >> I use detail name myself. Any better names for bucket with
> >> implementation details?
> >
> > What about `namespace private_` ? Even if access won't be controlled
> > by the compiler.
>
> That's my favourite replacement.
how is "private" more meaningful than "detail"?
private is a keyword defined by c++. detail is a namespace defined by boost.
both names aren't meaningful or descriptive unless you know their definition.
(.NET actually uses "private" and "public" and enforces it)