Subject: Re: [boost] sorting library proposal (Was: Review Wizard Status Report for June 2009)o
From: Steven Ross (spreadsort_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-20 15:20:58
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:20 AM, DE <satan66613_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> on 20.08.2009 at 3:42
> Steven Ross wrote :
> > Is there any reason why one approach (unnamed enum for each value vs.
> single
> > unnamed enum for all) is better than the other?
> actually no
> but i think keepeng values in one enum is more convenient
>
> <http://listarchives.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost>
>
Thanks for the confirmation (and the suggestions). I'll just leave them as
individual enums then.