Subject: [boost] [move][container] Fast-track reviews for Move and Container?
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-14 02:14:20
Hi,
As some others have mentioned, I'd like to ask if Boost.Move and
Boost.Container could meet the requirements for a Fast Track review (the
Review Wizard has the last word according to the Boost Formal Process,
but I'll like to see if there is consensus). Arguments:
Boost.Move
-> Only one header (move.hpp)
-> Technique already in use in Boost (in several detail namespaces).
This is a proposal for a common implementation.
-> Boost-conformant implementation available in sandbox.
Boost.Container
-> Most of them standard containers
-> Node containers are just wrappers over Boost.Intrusive
-> Most containers (all except stable_vector) were already reviewed for
Boost.Interprocess.
-> Boost-conformant implementation available in sandbox.
I'll be specially interested in pushing Move first, so that we could
have move semantics for Boost 1.41.
Best,
Ion