Subject: Re: [boost] [1.40.0] Beta 1 release candidate available
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-12 06:17:32
>> This is because he's asked for runtime-link=static in combination with
>> ICU?
>>
>> In that case the targets that depend upon that "impossible" combination
>> should not be built, but everything else should be?
>
> Hmm, isn't it just boost.regex? Or there are other targets that depend on
> that? Do you want some diagnostic, or silent skipping?
Yes I believe it's just regex in this case (unless there are any other
libraries that depend upon external C++ .so's?), a warning to the effect
that one particular combination can't be built would be fine. If this can
be fixed easily in the regex Jamfile then that's fine too.
John.