Subject: Re: [boost] request: BOOST_NO_SFINAE_EXPR macro
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-08-01 09:22:21
Beman Dawes wrote:
> Yes! I'd suggest you test with at least one compiler that supports the
> feature and one that doesn't. But in general just default to
> BOOST_NO_*.
Ok, here is the patch.
I chose to name the macros BOOST_NO_SFINAE_EXPR as I initially suggested
and BOOST_NO_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_DEFAULT_PARAMETER since the other
suggested name was really too long.
I also changed the GCC config header so that GCC 4.4 is not an unknown
version anymore.