Subject: Re: [boost] boost::directx?
From: Raindog (raindog_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-06-07 10:32:17
Gevorg Voskanyan wrote:
[snip]
> Others (most?) are not mature enough and/or established practice yet to be proposed for standards commitee consideration,
[snip]
It makes one wonder how languages such as C# or Java managed to have
infinitely more extensive standard libraries without existing maturity
and/or established practice of those libraries =(