Subject: Re: [boost] is_virtual_base_of ?
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-11 12:22:12
> I'm still having some problems with this. Some compilers are flaging as
> an error
> the case where B doesn't have a default constructor.
Rightly too I suspect :-(
What happens if you give class X an explicit default constructor that is
declared but not implemented? Maybe copy constructor, and assignment ops
too in case the compiler tries to automatically create those?
HTH, John.