Subject: Re: [boost] [threadpool] version 22 with default pool
From: Edouard A. (edouard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-03-09 04:39:41
On Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:16:08 +0100, "vicente.botet"
<vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> so no need to store the futures in a list. Do you see any problem with
this
> approach?
No, that's exactly what I had in mind. It should run faster as
partitionning will be parallelized as well.
-- EA