Subject: Re: [boost] [accumulators] why not operator+=?
From: John Phillips (phillips_at_[hidden])
Date: 2009-01-30 20:12:14
Eric Niebler wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> A nit perhaps, but why not overload += to process samples?
>>
>
> Would that be horribly misleading if the accumulator set isn't actually
> doing addition? I'm happy with the function-style interface.
>
Just personal preference, but I also prefer the function style
interface. A += interface would imply addition to me, whether it is what
is really happening or not.
John