Subject: Re: [boost] Breaking existing libraries
From: Tomas Puverle (Tomas.Puverle_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-12-03 15:53:42
"David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:87hc5lfak7.fsf_at_mcbain.luannocracy.com...
>> This relates to another thread. Should libraries be marked as
>> stable/experimental?
>
> I like it, but I would prefer stable/new. Libraries that aren't new
> shouldn't be unstable, and rewrites would make the library "new" again.
Agreed completely. This would be very useful to have.