Subject: Re: [boost] Breaking existing libraries
From: Thorsten Ottosen (nesotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-25 10:30:57
Tomas Puverle skrev:
>> If the compromise does not include going back to the old behavior for
>> boost::iterator_range, then I'm open to suggestions
>
> (Joke intended)
> This really doesn't seem to meet the criteria for a "compromise".
> Just sounds like you're getting your way.
Why? I'm open to including a new class with the old behavior, even
though I think it has little purpose.
Wha compromise did you have in mind?
-Thorsten