Subject: Re: [boost] Is Boost.Range broken?
From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-11-23 02:06:56
on Sat Nov 22 2008, "Scott McMurray" <me22.ca+boost-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
> It seems there's an assumption that a default-constructed iterator is
> either singular or past-the-end, but I saw no such requirement in
> either the standard or the "New iterator concepts" document.
Where was such an assumption made? I don't see it.
-- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com