$include_dir="/home/hyper-archives/boost/include";
include("$include_dir/msg-header.inc")
?>
- Next message: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
- Previous message: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
- In reply to: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
- Next in thread: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
- Reply: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
AMDG
Simonson, Lucanus J wrote:
> I personally believe that runtime indexable is preferable to compile
> time only. It is like defining an array that is only allowed to take
> compile time constants as indexes. How useful is that array?
>
Here's my take on the matter:
An algorithm that uses only compile-time indexing is preferable because
it can work with an arbitrary point class more easily.
A point class that supports runtime indexing is preferable because
it works easily with more algorithms.
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe
- Next message: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
- Previous message: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
- In reply to: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
- Next in thread: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
- Reply: Simonson, Lucanus J: "Re: [boost] Geometry and spatial indexes, my opinion"
$include_dir="/home/hyper-archives/boost/include";
include("$include_dir/msg-footer.inc");
?>