Subject: Re: [boost] [config] Any reason not to enable long long support infor Sun's compiler?
From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-07 13:24:31
Beman Dawes wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 8:42 AM, John Maddock
>> <john_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> Title says it all really, any reason why I should define
>>> BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG for sun's compiler? Seems to all work OK...
>>
>> It is pretty hard to imagine a compiler that doesn't support long
>> long
>> as a type, although some compilers were a bit slower about providing
>> long long overloads for library functions.
>>
>> I'd say go ahead and see what happens.
Nod, done, if there's any fallout I'll revert.
John.