Subject: Re: [boost] phoenix::bind
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-10-03 14:40:40
AMDG
Peter Dimov wrote:
> Eh. How about this one:
>
> lambda(_x, _y)[ let. _z = _x + _y, _z * _z ]
>
> I think that the implicit let will be much less of an issue in a
> lambda context than it is in Python (or Javascript), though.
Doesn't that imply that _a, _b, ... have to be enumerated in the
definition of let?
I like to have the possibility of defining new local variable names.
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe