Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] [config] boost::ulong_long

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-08-29 05:01:42

Next message: Paul Bormans: "Re: [boost] [Boost-users] Format local time in W3C format (YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss.sTZD) without providing the time zone myself?"
Previous message: Phil Bouchard: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] release()"
In reply to: Gennaro Prota: "[boost] [config] boost::ulong_long_type issue for Borland 5.6.4?"

Gennaro Prota wrote:
> John, is BOOST_HAS_LONG_LONG correctly defined for Borland 5.6.4? Many
> test failures seem related to this (I'm referring to trunk).

Apologies, I think I let this one slip through the cracks, which failures
are you refering to?

Regards, John.

Next message: Paul Bormans: "Re: [boost] [Boost-users] Format local time in W3C format (YYYY-MM-DDThh:mm:ss.sTZD) without providing the time zone myself?"
Previous message: Phil Bouchard: "Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] release()"
In reply to: Gennaro Prota: "[boost] [config] boost::ulong_long_type issue for Borland 5.6.4?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view