From: Daniel James (daniel_james_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-27 00:16:26
> On 26/07/2008, Emil Dotchevski <emil_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> >
> > Actually, I am not sure what's the best category for this library.
> > It's a low level lib, so perhaps it should go under utility,
> > miscellaneous doesn't seem descriptive enough. Any thoughts?
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Daniel James <daniel_james_at_[hidden]>wrote:
> I'm really not sure. Possibly 'Programming Interfaces'? Maybe also
> 'Concurrent Programming', although that might be stretching it.
2008/7/27 Alp Mestan <alpmestan_at_[hidden]>:
> I think utility would be fine.
But there currently isn't such a category. I'm not against creating
one, although it might be a little confusing since there's the utility
library.
> Concurrent Programming is in my opinion too "restrictive".
It can be in more than one category.
Daniel