From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-24 22:26:21
AMDG
Brian Davis wrote:
>> --except where the compiler can
>> prove that no event is registered for a particular integer.
>>
>
> Yes... Exactly. Either you pay for the overhead of the template type or you
> pay in the compiler adding extra code for types where events can be
> registered. . The difference is that it provides for direct data binding for
> primitive types. Syntax can make it clear to the compiler that extra code
> must be inserted. In your example there is no syntax that specifies a
> get/set for the local variable i. The problem I think is clear the
> solution... not so much.
>
Ok. That's better. One more issue:
Callbacks should be unregistered when the object that they are associated
with are destroyed, right? How do you propose to handle this for POD?
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe