From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-18 07:19:33
On Jul 18, 2008, at 6:59 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
> on Fri Jul 18 2008, "Leo Moisio" <leo.moisio-AT-gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The documentation for Boost.Test on boost.org seems very outdated,
>
> I find that situation to be almost intolerable. I realize not
> everyone
> will agree with me, but IMO if a library's documentation cannot be
> kept
> up to date, the changes to the library code (and maybe the library
> itself) don't belong in Boost.
>
The OP mentioned that there's an archive out there with more up-to-
date documentation, but the author hasn't copied it over to our
repository yet. Well, right now I would be satisfied with adding
Doxygen blocks to every public macro (or other item) as a work-around
(or substitute/enhancement). Said instruction should include what
supplemental headers are needed to enable the macro. (Or the author
can just include those headers automatically so users don't have to
worry about it.)
-- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT hotmail DOT com