Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] [fusion] constructing all elements of the fusion vector with the same argument

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-16 22:04:22

Next message: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [1.36.0] Libraries with unmerged changed - more accurate results."
Previous message: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] constructing all elements of the fusion vector with the same argument"
In reply to: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] constructing all elements of the fusion vector with the same argument"
Next in thread: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] constructing all elements of the fusion vector with the same argument"
Reply: Joel de Guzman: "Re: [boost] [fusion] constructing all elements of the fusion vector with the same argument"
Reply: Stjepan Rajko: "Re: [boost] [fusion] constructing all elements of the fusion vector with the same argument"

AMDG

Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Yeah, I agree. All views are inherently "lazy" anyway. So it's
> not a good name. More suggestions, anyone, please? functional_view?
> computed_view?

I just looked at lazy_sequence.hpp. Isn't it equivalent to
transform(mpl::range_c<int, 0, N>(), f)?

> Man! The fold algorithm can even be implemented in terms of this
> view. The only difference is that each "fold" is computed along the
> way. Maybe we should just call it "fold_view" ?

Awesome.

In Christ,
Steven Watanabe

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view