From: Joel de Guzman (joel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-07-08 08:18:24
oliver wrote:
> Joel de Guzman <joel <at> boost-consulting.com> writes:
>> Ok, thanks to other folks for reminding me of in_place_factory.
>> So, yes, in_place is indeed the solution here. I'm not sure though
>> when I can have the time to actually implement it, so first, I'll
>> ask the OP (Oliver Mueller) to add a trac ticket for this item.
>
> trac ticket added.
>
>> In the meantime, I welcome contributions. Implementing this shouldn't
>> be too hard, but it involves modifying a couple of container classes
>> to take in the lazy factories. Hmmm... come to think of it, a lot
>> of fusion functions can also take advantage of it (push_back, etc.).
>>
>> Any takers?
>>
>> Regards,
>
> since i need it i will try to get something working for vector first...hope
> there is not too much preprocessor magic going on in there:)
Haha! Hide, Joel, hide!!! :-)
Regards,
-- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net