From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-29 09:58:31
Beman Dawes wrote:
> BOOST_NO_UNICODE_LITERALS // no Unicode literals
Grrr... At least one compiler beta is supporting u and U literals, but
not U8 literals.
Although irritating, I guess that's a sign we need finer grained macros
for these. Because the case is significant, there is a bit of a naming
issue, too. Maybe:
BOOST_NO_UTF8_LITERALS // no u8 literals
BOOST_NO_CHAR16_T_LITERALS // no u literals
BOOST_NO_CHAR32_T_LITERALS // no U literals
Comments?
--Beman