From: Jens Seidel (jensseidel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-24 07:33:41
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 07:22:06AM -0400, Beman Dawes wrote:
> Peter Dimov wrote:
> > If yes, we'll need two release branches, one for 1.36.0, one for 1.35.x.
>
> Yes. branches/release will be for 1.36.0. I haven't given any thought to
> what the other should be named.
How about the usual name: branches/stable?
> > Either way: what would the procedure for the 1.36 branch be? What is its
> > starting point,
>
> branches/release
Maybe this could be renamed into branches/next_release.
Jens