Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] Preliminary Review Request (2): boost-memory

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: shiwei xu (xushiweizh_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-17 12:23:03

Next message: K. Noel Belcourt: "[boost] Fwd: [Boost-testing] [Problem in tr1/test Jamfile] Nightly testing broken"
Previous message: Richard Hadsell: "Re: [boost] Bjam in 1.34.1 missing g++ compile option for address-model=32"
In reply to: Tim Blechmann: "Re: [boost] Preliminary Review Request (2): boost-memory"

> anyway, if you need ordered memory access, you should add a memory
> barrier ...

Agreed. Surely you are right.

Next message: K. Noel Belcourt: "[boost] Fwd: [Boost-testing] [Problem in tr1/test Jamfile] Nightly testing broken"
Previous message: Richard Hadsell: "Re: [boost] Bjam in 1.34.1 missing g++ compile option for address-model=32"
In reply to: Tim Blechmann: "Re: [boost] Preliminary Review Request (2): boost-memory"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view