From: John Maddock (john_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-05-06 08:28:14
Paul A Bristow wrote:
> If this is really limited to floating_point's ulp, I'm puzzlied as to
> what is your objection to
>
> T float_distance(T, T)
>
> ?
None frankly, if folks are happy with
float_distance
float_next
float_prior
then I could go with that,
John.