From: Markus Werle (numerical.simulation_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-28 17:33:44
Eric Niebler wrote:
> put in a huge effort. I'll put together a detailed
> response, but for now: s/posit/unary_plus/. :-)
Thanks! Now I can vote for accpetance ;-P
I know it is late for that dsicussion, but even if STL has std::plus
I'd also like binary_* naming convention where appropriate,
say binary_plus, binary_minus, etc.
Your mileage may vary.
Markus