From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-03-07 09:22:50
Johan Torp wrote:
...
> This means disconnect semantics are different for threaded and
> non-threaded policies. How will you make this clear to users? A
> typical signals n' slots use case is - at least for me:
>
> signal<void()> sig;
>
> class Foo{
> Foo() {
> con = sig.connect(bind(&Foo::some_func, this));
> }
>
> scoped_connection con;
>
> void some_func() {}
> };
>
> If the signal was thread-safe this could very well crash the user
> application.
It would also crash if the signal wasn't thread safe, so where's the
difference?