Re: [boost] Compile-time power of a run-time base

From: Johan Råde (rade_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-02-18 09:16:33

John Maddock wrote:

> How about simply "known at compile time" as a compromise :-)
> 
> John.

I'm a mathematician.
And I prefer "known at compile-time".
It is the standard term in this context.

Also, "known in advance" is imprecise.
In advance of what?
Both as a mathematician and as a programmer I like precision.

--Johan Råde