From: Richard Webb (richard.webb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-20 06:11:17
John Maddock <john <at> johnmaddock.co.uk> writes:
Nice :(
>
> but again I suspect this depends on whether you
> implement TR1 or track the latest std WP
I'll ask what their intentions are.
> (which I believe can't be
> implemented without rvalue references).
>
I ran into that when i was looking at a test failure with
add_reference<void> (the Beta MS TR1 won't compile it) - the WP clarifies
that void should be supported, but also replaces add_reference with
add_(rvalue/lvalue)_reference.
Still, at least i'm learning more about how all this stuff works while
testing it!
Thanks,
Richard Webb