Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] Is there any interest in a template geometry library?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: artemp (artem.mapnik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2008-01-17 05:47:02

Next message: Vectra17: "Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?"
Previous message: John Torjo: "[boost] [Fwd: Re: [Boost-announce] [review] Fast track review of Boost.Utility/Singleton begins today] (on behalf of Ingolf Steinbach)"
Maybe in reply to: Barend Gehrels: "[boost] Is there any interest in a template geometry library?"

Barend Gehrels wrote:
>
> Is there any interest in a template geometry library?
>
I'm very interested!

--Artem
http://mapnik.org

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-there-any-interest-in-a-template-geometry-library--tp14801937p14915938.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Next message: Vectra17: "Re: [boost] Boost.Tests: Unit test defines own main() function, why?"
Previous message: John Torjo: "[boost] [Fwd: Re: [Boost-announce] [review] Fast track review of Boost.Utility/Singleton begins today] (on behalf of Ingolf Steinbach)"
Maybe in reply to: Barend Gehrels: "[boost] Is there any interest in a template geometry library?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view