From: Ilya Sokolov (fal_delivery_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-26 17:01:22
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>>>>>>> 2. Unfortunately original test modult function signature is
unacceptable for DLL initialization. So i had to introduce new one.
[snip]
>> I still don't see why is it unacceptable. Can you state it explicitly?
>
> Hmm. How to state it more explicitly. How about this:
>
> It does not link.
i.e.,
boost::unit_test::test_suite* init_unit_test_suite( int, char* [] )
link, but
bool init_unit_test()
doesn't link?
>> Problem arise with library that should work on both platforms, with
and without dll support.
>
> What platforms are you talking about?
dos/djgpp
> Why the solutions I provided are not satisfactory?
they are too complex for such simple problem