Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] [review] Review of Unordered library begins today December 7

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-09 18:37:49

Next message: Joel de Guzman: "[boost] [fusion] Intel 10 help [ was Re: Failures in your Boost libraries as of 2007-12-09 [trunk] ]"
Previous message: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "[boost] [utility] value_init workaround fixed [Re: value_init_test failure]"
In reply to: Ion Gaztañaga: "[boost] [review] Review of Unordered library begins today December 7"
Next in thread: Daniel James: "Re: [boost] [review] Review of Unordered library begins today December 7"
Reply: Daniel James: "Re: [boost] [review] Review of Unordered library begins today December 7"

Ion Gaztañaga wrote:

> The formal review of the Unordered library, proposed by Daniel James,
> begins today :

Just a few simple remarks.
Why not add support for moving and in-place construction?

Next message: Joel de Guzman: "[boost] [fusion] Intel 10 help [ was Re: Failures in your Boost libraries as of 2007-12-09 [trunk] ]"
Previous message: Niels Dekker - mail address until 2008-12-31 : "[boost] [utility] value_init workaround fixed [Re: value_init_test failure]"
In reply to: Ion Gaztañaga: "[boost] [review] Review of Unordered library begins today December 7"
Next in thread: Daniel James: "Re: [boost] [review] Review of Unordered library begins today December 7"
Reply: Daniel James: "Re: [boost] [review] Review of Unordered library begins today December 7"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view