From: Tobias Schwinger (tschwinger_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-12-02 07:36:13
Beman Dawes wrote:
> Tobias,
>
> function_types is showing 36 failures. What is the plan to eliminate or
> mark these up as expected?
>
> |function_types|
> fast_mem_fn_example: msvc-7.1
> interface_example: msvc-7.1
Those ^^ seem regressions - I'll try to fix them.
> member_ccs: darwin-4.0.1 darwin-4.0.1 darwin-4.0.1
> gcc-4.1.2_sunos_i86pc gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1_linux_x86_64
> intel-linux-9.0 intel-vc8-win-10.0 msvc-8.0_64
> member_ccs_exact: darwin-4.0.1 darwin-4.0.1 darwin-4.0.1
> gcc-4.1.2_sunos_i86pc gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1_linux_x86_64
> intel-linux-9.0 intel-vc8-win-10.0 msvc-8.0_64
> nonmember_ccs: darwin-4.0.1 gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1
> gcc-4.2.1_linux_x86_64 intel-linux-9.0 intel-vc8-win-10.0 msvc-8.0_64
> nonmember_ccs_exact: darwin-4.0.1 gcc-4.2.1 gcc-4.2.1
> gcc-4.2.1_linux_x86_64 intel-linux-9.0 intel-vc8-win-10.0 msvc-8.0_64
Those ^^ are due to a
#error test skipped
kind of thing and should be marked as expected (the library's default
configuration does not know about nonstandard calling conventions
implemented by those compilers - probably none).
I recently spotted some problems with other compilers (BCC in
particular) that deserve a closer look.
What's the schedule for the upcoming release - IOW how much time do I have?
Regards,
Tobias