From: Steven Watanabe (steven_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-21 14:02:21
AMDG
Sven Van Echelpoel <sven.vanechelpoel <at> telenet.be> writes:
>
> Gee, thanks for jumping on this so quickly! I wanted to apply your
> findings to a solution, but then I realized what stumped me in the first
> place: this code can be pretty obscure I wanted to correct s_item's
> type typedef by replacing it with something like element_type, until I
> saw that type is already a typedef for item_type. Still I'm gonna
> proceed and see how far that gets me. I'll keep you posted.
I think you can just use mpl::set0<> instead of mpl::set<>.
That will solve you're particular problem.
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe