From: David Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2007-11-18 09:01:12
on Sat Nov 17 2007, "Robert Ramey" <ramey-AT-rrsd.com> wrote:
> A little greping reveals the following headers which would seem to violate
> "standard practice". I've tried to exclude those which are "convenience
> headers" which do nothing but call a bunch of includes for some
> library.
That's been a standard practice for many years. What we have never
done intentionally is to place components that are not a part of a
library's documented public interface in namespace boost, nor their
headers in boost/.
-- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com